368 Mapping of analog setpoints (SP)
- Created
- 24 Aug 2006
- Status
- In Force (green)Closed: the solution is part of the standard. No further comments are taken. Show the workflow
- Part
- Part 8-1 (2004)
- Links
- None
- Page
- 84 and 86
- Clause
- 20.5 and 20.7 and 20.7.1.3
- Paragraph
- Category
- Issue for edition 2 of this part
Issue
The tables show mapping of 7-2 "Value" into xxx$ctlVal. It does not allow the setMag structured attribute of setpoints to be used.
Proposal
Indicate that 7-2 "Value" is mapped to the underlying CDC of the control object. For example, part of PDIS.PoRch setpoint data is mapped to PDIS.PoRch.Oper.setMag.f.
This also requires additional text (and another Table) in Annex E.4 near E.4.4 indicating values for setMag.
One file is attached to this tissue. Sign in to open it.
| Discussion | Created |
|---|---|
| In Force (green) | 13 Oct 06 |
|
Ballot Period
-Change 3 place 'Where <xxx> is the appropriate CDC (e.g. ctlVal or setMag)' to 'Where <xxx> is the appropriate CDC (e.g. ctlVal or setMag$f or setMag$i)'
-The suggestion for Table E.8 shows mxVal for CDC APC. This CDC has only setMag and not mxVal. The M/O/C entry for this line should be as 'M for APC and ASG'. -Tables E.9 and E.10 should be modified like E.8 shown above Replication of Bruce's comment. |
12 Oct 06 |
| Ballot Period Agree with Bruce's second comment. | 12 Oct 06 |
| Ballot Period | 29 Sep 06 |
| Discussion (red) agreed...Proposed text changes are attached. | 07 Sep 06 |