1877   PSOF isn't presented in tDomainLNGroupPEnum

Created: 03 Jul 2023

Status: Future Improvement

Part: Part 6 (2019; Edition 2.1)

Links:

Page: 141

Clause: Annex A

Paragraph: -

Issue

LN PSOF isn't presented in tDomainLNGroupPEnum.
But LN PSOF is presented in 61850-7-4 ed. 2.1.

Proposal

Add PSOF to tDomainLNGroupPEnum (SCL_Enum)

Discussion Created Status
Approved Future 12 Dec 23 Future Improvement
agree to move to future improvement 05 Jul 23 Approval (Future Improvement)
I doubt that this issue has an interoperability background. I suggest to postpone is too. Change to "Future improvement". 04 Jul 23 Discussion (red)
to discuss 04 Jul 23 Discussion (red)
The list of LN in SCL has not been harmonized with 7-4 2.1. Not only PSOF is missing.

The intention is to rely on NSD rather than SCL to know the list of LN for a domain.

In SCL only 7-4 is considered but many other domains exists which are not included.

Do we intend to keep a strong link between SCL and 7-4? and so to maintain an up-to-date exhaustive list of LN from 7-4?

There is an ongoing work on LN for edition 3. I think this update should be postponed for edition 3 to decide what will be required really in SCL. Until then, the PSOF is accepted by SCL but not in list of predefined LN.

04 Jul 23 Triage

 

Privacy | Contact | Disclaimer

Tissue DB v. 24.4.30.1