1832 SICS I45 not clear enough
- Created
- 12 Jul 2022
- Status
- In Force (Editorial)Closed: the editorial correction is part of the standard. No further comments are taken. Show the workflow
- Batch
- 57/2673/INFThis tissue went out with this batch, which was closed on 01 Apr 2024.
- Part
- Part 6 (2019; Edition 2.1)
- Links
- None
- Page
- 241
- Clause
- Annex G
- Paragraph
- Table G.1
Issue
"Support ldName for LD name specification" is not clear enough if it is support on import or on modification
Proposal
review the sentence with "Import ldName which have been configured by an SCT in the SCD and take into account"
| Discussion | Created |
|---|---|
| In Force (Editorial) Batch '57/2673/INF' (2) closed | 01 Apr 24 |
| Editorial Approve | 11 Oct 22 |
| Approval (Editorial) Update Service ConfLdName definition with : "If this element is present, as a server, the IED allows the SCT to define functional LD names (by means of the LDevice ldName attribute)" | 05 Oct 22 |
|
Triage
I45 is conditional C3, i.e. service capability exposure.
ConfLdName indicates "if this element is present, the IED allows as a server to define functional LD names (by means of the LDevice ldName attribute)." The service capaiblity description could be enhanced with "the IED allows the SCT as a server ...". |
02 Aug 22 |