1395 Client LN attributes

Created
02 Jun 2015
Status
In Force (green)Closed: the solution is part of the standard. No further comments are taken. Show the workflow
Part
Part 6 (2009-12; Edition 2)
Links
None
Page
78
Clause
9.3.8
Paragraph
Category
Issue may impact interoperability of implementations of Edition 2

Issue

From TF User Feedback / IOP 2013

The actual format required for an ClientLN (used for ReportControl Block reservation) is not specified fully or in an understandable way.
LDInst is required, but for Client only IEDs, there is no LD. The standard indicates to select a random LDInst and provides some guidance. However, in order to insure that there is interoperability and that importers understand that there is NO LDInst, the value to indicate this needs to be standardized.

Proposal

Proposal to modify part 6, that curretnly recommends to use LD0 in a "shall use LD0"

DiscussionCreated
In Force (green) 07 Jul 15
Ballot Period Will be applicable in Ed 2.1 of IEC 61850-6
Agree that we request the usage of LD0 as required in the described case.
15 Jun 15