114 Naming URCB
- Created
- 16 Mar 2005
- Status
- In Force (green)Closed: the solution is part of the standard. No further comments are taken. Show the workflow
- Part
- Part 8-1 (2004)
- Links
- None
- Page
- Clause
- 17.1.1.1 & 17.1.1.2
- Paragraph
- Note
- Category
- No impact on this part
Issue
Naming of urcb<yy><xx> is a recommendation or a rule ?
If this is just a recommendation, no automatic processing can be done by parsing an SCD file concerning ReportControl names.
If this becomes a rule, the note is incomplete and should address the clause from part 7-2 §14.2.1 b) which “permit a client to view only one instance of the report control class based on either the client’s connection or on its authentication’s view …» . In this case , name should be urcb<yy> independently of the numbers of clients connected.
Proposal
The recommendation becomes a rule which considers the 2 cases of part 7-2
| Discussion | Created |
|---|---|
|
In Force (green)
Montreal: -> Not accepted;
Report Controls exist as elements in the SCL files and there is an attribute to distinguish between unbuffered and buffered. PhM : the question was not to distinguish buffered / unbuffered reports (brcb/urcb), but to distinguish 2 naming conventions , 1 with an instance number, another without , example: - urcbST01 if RCB is visible from any client - urcbST if RCB is private to the client ‘s connection Portland: Accepted |
16 Mar 05 |