1042 SGCB definition includes information that is not mapping specific
- Created
- 15 Mar 2013
- Status
- In Force (green)Closed: the solution is part of the standard. No further comments are taken. Show the workflow
- Part
- Part 8-1 (2011; Edition 2)
- Links
- None
- Page
- 73
- Clause
- 16.1
- Paragraph
- Category
- Issue for edition 2 of this part
Issue
The definition mentions that the way to know the number of SGs is the PIXIT, when it is clearly stated in SCL <SettingControl>.
The definition states that settings shall be stored in non-volatile memory. Of course. But this sentence has nothing to do with the mapping of the SGCB structure in MMS.
The sentence "The initial value of EditSG shall be 0", has to be stated in part 7.2 not in 8.1
Proposal
Remove the two first paragraphs from this clause.
If the information about the initial value of EditSG and the storage of settings, is not already included in part 7-2, a new TISSUE for part 7.2 including this sentences will be needed.
| Discussion | Created |
|---|---|
| In Force (green) | 15 Oct 13 |
| Ballot Period | 12 Apr 13 |
| Discussion (red) I agree. | 11 Apr 13 |
|
Discussion (red)
First sentence - agree: We may remove in deed the PIXIT requirement since the setting group control block capabilities are visible in the ICD representation of the device.
Second sentence: The non-volatile property is already defined in 7-2 for the definition of the FC = SP, and SG The sentenc can be removed from 8-1 Third sentence - agree that the sentence belongs to 7-2. It can be removed from 8-1 |
11 Apr 13 |