IEC 61850 Tissue Database

Every status a technical issue can be in, and the steps the workflow allows between them. The status this tissue is in now is the box drawn in bold.

Hide the workflow

TissueDB status workflow back to Discussion Batch Triage Accepted Discussion Drafting Implementation Verify Draft Implementation Analysis Of Compatibility Conformance Test Preparation Conformance Test Verification Ballot Period Solution Accepted Must Implement In Force Approval (N/A) Approval (Duplicate) Approval (Editorial) Approval (Future Improvement) Not Applicable Duplicate Future Improvement Editorial Must Implement (Editorial) In Force (Editorial) Legend normal route of a technical solution accepted or released → in force classification branch (working group approval) back to Discussion for rework (lines are bundled) reaching the final state
The route a technical solution takes from Triage to In Force, the working group approvals that close an issue instead, and the ways back to Discussion for rework. Opens full size in a new tab.

950 Object Reference Name lengths

Created
05 Dec 2012
Status
Not ApplicableClosed: the issue falls outside the scope of the standard. No further comments are taken. Hide the workflow
Part
Part 7-2 (2010; Edition 2)
Links
None
Page
157
Clause
19.2 Referencing an instance of a class
Paragraph
Category
Issue for edition 2 of this part

Issue

An object reference is defined as LDName/LNName.DataName[.DataName[. ...].DataAttributeName[.DAComponentName[. ...]

Absolute lengths are defined for LDName, LNName and DataName and several tissues do exist refering to these lengths.

What is the maximum allowed length for DataAttributeName and DAComponentName? I cannot find anything on these lengths in -7-2 19.2 or in any other part of 7-2 (Or any other part of the standard).

Is a DataAttributeName (and a DAComponentName equal to a DataName? This can resolve my questiong but there is no text in -7-2 (or any other part) that does so.

Can somebody advise me on text in any part that clarifies the maximum allowed length for DataAttributeName and DAComponentName?

Kind Regards,

Andre Steenveld.

Proposal

Clarify -7-2 19.2 on the maximum alowed length for DataAttributeName and DAComponentName

DiscussionCreated
Not Applicable Your clause reference is related to Edition 1 (7-2:2003). The lengths for Edition 2 (7-2:2007 from 2010) are defined in Clause 22. It is not based on the generic syntax, but on the instance length of the different name parts.Observe further, that attribute names are defined inside the CDCs of 7-3, and with Edition 2 private CDCs are no longer allowed; so their length restriction has only to be taken care of by the standardization activities in IEC. 14 Dec 12