2026 FaultSourceTypeKind doesn't follow naming convention
- Created
- 28 Jan 2026
- Status
- Drafting ImplementationThe agreed solution is being written up as text for the standard. Any signed-in reader may comment. Show the workflow
- Part
- Part 90-6 (2018)
- Links
- None
- Page
- 276
- Clause
- 7.4.9
- Paragraph
- Table 50
Issue
7.4.9 FaultSourceTypeKind enumeration
jDocBuilder2.05 reports error
<<enumeration>> DOEnums_90_6::FaultSourceTypeKind,,"enumeration classes with bad name: name should not contain 'type' and/or 'enum', and should end with 'Kind'"
Proposal
Rename FaultSourceTypeKind as FaultSourceKind
and associated
SFPI.AffPhsTyp ENG (FaultSourceTypeKind)
Set a possible limited set of types of faults under focus by the
considered LN
| Discussion | Created |
|---|---|
| Drafting Implementation As discussed in Feb 2026 WG 17 meeting | 23 Jul 26 |
|
Discussion (red)
It seems the warning on enumeration names is following a CIM modelling guide recommendation.
This tissue avoids the warning and prepares for the publication of IEC 61850-7-430 Ed1: Distribution Automation |
23 Jul 26 |
| Accepted Discussed in Feb 2026 meeting | 23 Jul 26 |
|
Triage
Please note that the name of an enumeration is not normative. You can change the name of an enumeration without having to create a tissue for that.
What is normative is the literal of the enumeration for a given data object. See IEC 61850-7-2 Ed2.1 Clause 6.1 |
04 Feb 26 |