1043 SetEditSGValues should not detail nothing about non-volatile storage

Created
15 Mar 2013
Status
In Force (green)Closed: the solution is part of the standard. No further comments are taken. Show the workflow
Part
Part 8-1 (2011; Edition 2)
Links
None
Page
74
Clause
16.2.3
Paragraph
Category
Issue for edition 2 of this part

Issue

The sentence "A value that has been successfully written shall be non-volatile as part of the setting group set" has nothing to do with IEC 61850-7-2 clause 16.3.4.1: “Setting new value shall become effective only after the client has confirmed the value by issuing the service ConfirmEditSGValues”.

See also Figure 22 in IEC 61850-7-2, where it is clearly depicted that SetEditSGValue is acting over the edition buffer, that will update the SG table with the ConfirmEditsGvalues service.

Proposal

The proposal consists of removing the sentence A value that has been successfully written shall be non-volatile as part of the setting group set" from 8.1 (this is 7.2 (application) specific).

DiscussionCreated
In Force (green) 15 Oct 13
Ballot Period 7-2 states already:
Setting new value shall become effective only after the client has confirmed the value by issuing the service ConfirmEditSGValues.

Therefore, there is no need for an additional statement in 8-1
Proposal: remove the sentence:
A value that has been successfully written shall be non-volatile as part of the setting group set.

12 Apr 13