1268 Assigment of single CDC to DOclass
Created: 23 May 2014
Status: In Force (green)
Part: Part 7-1 (2011; Edition 2)
Category: Issue for edition 2 of this part
In chapter 13.1 is described that in different namespaces it is allowed to use the same DOname with different CDC. The mentioned example is DOname Pos (DPC) in 7-4, but WNAC.Pos (MV). This is not correct anymore. In the uML TF we try to harmonize the usage of DOclasses with only one CDC-type. Also WNAC.Pos doesn't exist in the current version.
Skip the complete paragraph. Add a new paragraph to describe the rule of modelling DOclasses with unique CDC.
Note: To see attachments you have to log-in first.
||08 Mar 16
||In Force (green)
Agreed to remove WNAC.Pos.
It has been agreed by the editors that a DO, e.g. Pos, semantic = Circuit breaker/switch position, CDC=DPC) cannot be redefined by another namespace that is based on SA domain namespace (7-4). If this other namespace is not based on SA domain namespace (7-4), e.g. a completely new domain (independent of SA), it could redefine the DO Pos and XCBR as well. A comprehensive set of rules will be added in 7-1 to clarify the dependencies between the IEC 61850 related namespaces in order to allow independent evolution of the domain application namespaces. Meanwhile, see the presentation attached.
|15 Jan 16
||16 Jul 15
Agreed to remove WNAC.Pos
However, further explanation are required about the fact that DOclasses with only one CDC-type shall be used for the name spaces concept allows having such DOclasses.
|23 May 14
Privacy | Contact | Disclaimer
Tissue DB v. 220.127.116.11